I am disappointed with SAPP's announcement that they will move a motion of no confidence against our PM. The motion, if tabled will be unprecedented in Malaysian's history. No such motion has been tabled against any PM, more so by a component party. It will be slap on our PM's face and will be forever be a black dot on his legacy. Our PM definitely does not deserve this.
Pak Lah is a liberal PM compared to his predecessor. He has moved the government to be more transparent and is genuinely making efforts to return the dignity and independence of the judiciary and the ACA. Yes, we are all angry with him for reducing fuel subsidy but at the going rate, how long can we maintain the subsidy? Its a case of "good policies but bad politics".
A motion of no confidence against the PM is not merely a motion of no confidence against the person of PM but his entire government and the coalition that he leads, which includes all component parties.
Do we need a motion of no confidence against our PM now? At a precarious time like this? From a component party? Whilst some might hail it as a new found bravery, I suspect sinister political motives at play. SAPP has 2 MPs at present and they are trying to use this as a 'threat' against the PM to concede to their demands. If we allow component parties to threaten a motion of no confidence each time its demands are not met, how can any coalition ever rule peacefully or fulfill its mandate? Our politics will degenerate into politics of threat and ransom holding.
Component parties will hold the government at ransom and make ridiculous demands. The government will be rendered impotent and ineffective. Policies and long term plans will be deferred to meet the immediate demands of the recalcitrant party. The same is applicable if the coalition of opposition parties comes to power under such circumstances. They too will be rendered useless if this trend is allowed to flourish.
A vote of no confidence should only be tabled in dire conditions and when the leader has clearly departed from the express mandate given to him in the last election. How has the coalition or the leadership departed from its mandate since the last election?
We must not allow a motion of no confidence to be used as a bargaining chip or for political showmanship. One should use the sword of "motion of no confidence" sparingly, lest it cuts the very hand that attempts to yield it.
BN must not condone it and come down hard on SAPP. Even if we lose the government because of it, so be it. We cannot allow component parties to hold the coalition at ransom. We either govern properly and with discipline or not at all.
One can leave the coalition if one is not happy with it but to table a motion of no confidence whilst remaining a component is a stab in the back. We can have different opinions and take different stands on issues but this one act by SAPP amounts to treachery.
Sack SAPP from the BN.
Murugesan Sinnandavar
5 comments:
IT'S BADAWI THAT IS DIGGING HIS OWN GRAVE HERE.HE'S TO AFRAID TO DEFEND HIMSELF AGAINST MAHATHIR.
MAHATHIR STARTED THE QUOTA FOR THE UMNO PRESIDENTSHIP AND NOW HE'S AGAINST IT!BADAWI SHOULD FIRE BACK!
MAHATHIR SCREWED THE JUDICIARY DURING HIS TERM,BADAWI IS UNWINDING ALL THAT AND SHOULD FIRE MAHATHIR ON THAT!
MAHATHIR CONTROLLED THE MEDIA, BADAWI IS RELAXING IT.BADAWI SHOULD FIRE MAHATHIR AGAIN!
BADAWI IS NOT AS RACIST AS MAHATHIR,THAN WHY IS BADAWI QUIET WHENEVER MAHATHIR FIRES HIM?
"One should use the sword
of "motion of no confidence"
sparingly, lest it cuts the very
hand that attempts to yield it."
A quote worthy statement! Yes I agree that SAPP initiating a motion of no confidence against the PM is unjust,imprudent and inappropriate.
The people voted for SAPP mainly because the were in support of the banner SAPP was contesting under. If SAPP were to defect, then an election should be held to allow the voters to decide on who their representatives should be.
It does indeed look like SAPP is holding the BN coalition at ransom. But what’s really sad is that they are also holding the faith of the people who supported for them at a forfeit.
Regards
Sangeet
Murugesan, a sap is a sap by any other name.
I am very curious???
Meenachi Indian?? Can you please explain your ambiguous statement? I would really like to understand it.
Thank you
Sangeet
As a democracy country we are allowed to express our view so long if it is within the guidelines.
When Hindraff gather on the streets, BN say that is not the way of Malaysian behave. When SAPP move a motion of no confidence againt PM, BN says it not right.
Where is pure democarcy in Malaysia ?
Rastaman
Post a Comment